PDA

View Full Version : "Morning after pill"


FinalDragoon
Dec 15th, 2005, 11:10 AM
For those that don't know what the morning after pill is, it is a pill that ensures that you don't become pregnant after unprotected sex by killing the growing fetus within you if taken within X number of days (varies per person) after the fact. You need a perscription for it (which is bull), but that is easy enough to get nowadays given a good, understanding doctor. So you wouldn't think it would be too much of a problem? You get your perscription, you go and get it filled, and you go home. But, believe it or not, in the second step is the problem.

What's happening is that some pharmacists are refusing to fill the perscriptions. Why? Pretty much because of religious reasons. And you would think "Well that's bull. But they can always go to a different pharmacy and get it filled." Well... Not quite. Some of these vile pharmacists are taking it a step farther. When they are presented with the perscription, they snatch it out of the woman's hand and refuse to give it back. Thus disallowing her to get her pill from elsewhere and forcing the pregancy. The ones that will fill the perscription will speak very loudly and lecture the woman on the 'evils' of what she is doing. Thus allowing every damned person in the area to hear that she had unprotected sex and humiliating her. And who likes a religious 'You'll to hell!' fire and brimstone speech against you anyway?

The Access to Legal Pharmaceuticals Act, or ALPhA is stuck in the senate right now. It basically says to pharmacists: "Look - this is bullshit. If you have a pharmacist who feels that he can't fill the perscription, then make sure there's someone on staff who can." It also protects the woman against humiliation and the like.

But the problem lies in this: There are many republicans stalling this in the senate. And also - what's to stop pharmacists to say... Not give you ridallin because they view people with disorders such as ADHD as evil? Or not to give you hormones if you are transitioning because they view transexuals as evil? Or not to give you, say, pennicilan because they say "God gave you this illness. You should accept that." Nothing at all based on their recent performance with the morning after pill. And this isn't an isolated incident - it is happening all over the place and there are hundreds of counts each year!

Akira Raine
Dec 15th, 2005, 08:11 PM
O.O that's so gay!! I think they should give it to the girls, it's the GIRLS morals not theirs!! That's horrible and stupid. *beats all pharmasists with a stick*

Poki
Dec 17th, 2005, 11:20 AM
^Not all pharmacists do that you know. And by now most of them have to give medicine to whomever comes in with a prescription, the only thing time they could ever not give you anything is when either your insurance doesn't cover it or your doctor did not prescribe it.

FinalDragoon
Dec 17th, 2005, 02:03 PM
^Not all pharmacists do that you know.

That's not the point.


(This is what my rant was about. . .)


Funny little comment - look at the name of the bill. The Access to Legal Pharmaceuticals Act. Do you know what that basically is saying? Look at the title - it is saying that it is legalizing "access" to already "legal" pharmaceuticals? Our society is in a sad state when we need bills to make legal drugs legal.

Shinkouseikatsu
Dec 18th, 2005, 12:41 AM
Pharmacist doesn't have the rights to refuse prescription drugs. There's a reason why it's prescribed in the first place.

I heard it on the news not so long ago that they're trying to ban the Plan B, morning after pill. First of all, taking it within 72 hours, there aren't any fuckin' fetus. It takes about 2-4 weeks for a fetus to develop. Basically what this drugs do is to force a woman to have her period and discharge the lining of her uterus. I'd say Plan B is a good drugs for those who had unprotected sex and it's only for emergency.

I think Republican wants US population to multiply, and it's not good.

Akira Raine
Dec 18th, 2005, 10:26 PM
that DOES sound like a good pill... why would they ban that? that's stupid.

Gian
Dec 18th, 2005, 10:48 PM
It's because they're pro-life. (Alot of christians are.)
Just like abortions, taking the morning after pill kills a baby.
It's all a religious standpoint. Personally, I'm all for taking the pill (though I'm male) and not ruining your life with an unwanted baby.

Darksage
Dec 18th, 2005, 11:41 PM
hmm

The pharmacists who refuse to give out the prescriptions should be fired. That's as retarded as a teacher who only teaches the part of her subject that (s)he likes.

Now about the actual pill? Once again (as I've said in other threads), Free Will. Religious people should know that. God gave us free will
And for the political part, we are given free choice anyway. Whether it's right or wrong to use it I wont say, I haven't weighed the pros and cons of it, but I do believe the people who want to take one should not be denied the oppurtunity to

Akira Raine
Dec 19th, 2005, 10:06 AM
yeah, i agree. It's not really kililng the baby, it's just getting it out of your system (according to Shinkouseikatsu's post). And yeah, it hasn't had any time to develop so I don't think that'd be a big deal. That pharmasist should be fired!! I think they should sell those, sounds good for people that would need it.

Obsideon
Dec 29th, 2005, 11:12 AM
there's one thing I hate worse then when someone is narrowminded, and that is when they try to force their narowminded beliefs, and their narrowminded morals on other people. They have no right. I have no right to demand of any other man to hold the door for ladies, it's what I do out of my nature not theirs. They do not have the right to force their beliefs on others either. One major issue with this is capatalism in general, I believe healthcare (docters, pharmacies, med. insurance) should at least have one form of everything nationalized. I'm not saying all pharmacies should be property of the government, but that the government should have an official pharmacy wherin such innexcusable actions could be better regulated and avoided. Naturally it would be the patient's choice whether to use said nationalized option or another, just as it is a person's choice whether to send a package but USPS or UPS or whatever.